![]() ![]() It's relatively easy to enforce configuration with a small amount of hosts, but once you start getting above three hosts or so, it becomes exponentially harder to ensure sameness. In my opinion, if you have the license to use it, a dVS is superior in features and more importantly enforces the configuration to be the same on every host. ![]() If the uplinks need to be active, unused you need to match that, MTU, Delayed Ack, etc. ![]() The important part is to match the best practice in the dVS. It's true that many manufacturers don't publish as much detail about dVS best practices, although I know of at least one that does. Overall, you can really use either switch architecture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |